Archive for the ‘Problems’ Category

Demand for solar energy subsidies puts stress on New York state program

Wednesday, November 18th, 2009

More New York homeowners than ever want to put solar panels on their houses.

That should be good news for the 174 contractors registered with the state to install solar photovoltaic systems. But the demand has put such a strain on subsidies for residential solar that the state has reduced the amount offered, hoping to make a dwindling pot of money last through the end of the year.

A new round of funding for 2010 and beyond has not yet been approved, and that leaves solar power installers hanging. They can’t sign up customers until they know what the subsidy will be. And without customers, an emerging industry employing between 800 and 1,000 people statewide can’t create more “green-collar” jobs.

Solar is popular for a couple of reasons. The price of solar panels is coming down due to increased production in China and falling prices for materials. It’s also easier for people with solar installations to sell their surplus electricity back to the grid.

On Oct. 13, to keep the money from running out, NYSERDA cut the incentives for residential solar photovoltaic installations from $3 per watt to $2.50 per watt, up to the first 4 kilowatts. Incentives for commercial and nonprofit solar power installations also were cut.

In one day, the agency was flooded with applications — several installers heard it was more than 100, though NYSERDA will only say it was “quite a few.” Some installers were left with the impression those applications would soak up whatever money was left in the solar incentive program.

Read More.

Why Solar Rebates Are Becoming Extinct

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

Solar rebate programs are winding down. Austin Energy cut solar rebates for homeowners by a third. Xcel Energy will cut its rebate program by about 50 percent. The Long Island Power Authority made an immediate cut in its rebate program, and one scheduled for January. New York reduced its solar incentive by 50 cents per watt in October. Massachusetts closed its rebate program, and California is gradually decreasing its incentives. Australia also stopped its rebate program. However, a 30 percent federal tax credit still exists.

Popularity and the impact on budgets are the reasons why rebates are being reduced.

Solar rebates were meant to “jumpstart the industry,” said Xcel spokesperson Tom Henley. Now it is time to “help maintain it as a viable industry.”

In 2005, New Jersey ran out of funds for its solar power grant program. The program covered up to 60 percent of a solar power system’s cost. Rebates were lowered a number of times, and projects were put on hold. Installers reported layoffs. The state decided to create an incentive structure based on Solar Renewable Energy Credits (SRECs). The state purchases a certain amount of power from solar power system owners to meet their Renewable Portfolio Standard requirements. The state is currently creating 15-year contracts for the program.

“We looked at what was happening and it was pretty clear that the program was unsustainable. We just couldn’t fund — with taxpayer money — all of the demand we were seeing,” said Lance Miller, chief of policy and planning for the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU). 7

“When you look at the numbers, it’s clear that systems are getting installed,” said Miller. “Things are not exactly where they should be, but it’s better than having a rebate program that is continually running out of money. We’re still working on making this better.”

“New Jersey is certainly having some issues — that’s apparent. But they’ve done a great job in looking at creative alternatives that will get us beyond rebates,” said Shaun Chapman, east coast campaigns director for the Vote Solar Initiative. “Is that any consolation to the business-owner who’s having trouble getting jobs done? Probably not. But it’s important to use that experience so others can move in a different direction.”

Read More.

Solar Millennium Switches to Dry Cooling

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

Solar Millennium said Monday it plans to use dry cooling for its solar thermal power project in Nevada.

The Berkeley-based company announced the switch, which could add to its project’s costs but win it some goodwill from lawmakers and environmentalists, after its plan to use as much as 1.3 billion gallons of water per year for its project met strong opposition from residents of Amargosa Valley.

Using air cooling could cut the water use by 90 percent from the original proposal, the company said. Dry cooling techniques are generally more expensive and lead to lower efficiency for the plant. But water is a precious commodity in the deserts of western states, where many solar thermal power plants are under development.

Solar Millennium is proposing to build one or possibly two solar power plants with 242-megawatt of generation capacity each. Each power plant would cost about $1.5 billion to build, the company said.

Read More.